The Pudding and the Proof

Sci-Fi writer, gamer and blogger Gary Mitchell has made the following comment on his blog:

GOSSIP AS OF 14/2/2013: The big buzz at the mo is the merging of ‘Miniature Wargames’ and ‘Battlegames’ under the aegis of Henry Hyde, Andrew Hubback no longer having a role at the mag. Difficult for me to comment as I know both chaps well. Official stuff best accessed via My email correspondents (not Henry or Andrew or anyone from Atlantic) express concern the new mag will go ‘old skool’ and once again the sci-fant end will be left ‘out of print’. Mm, most gamers do both. There is, of course ‘The Ancible still in virtual print. Maybe it’s time for a ‘kickstarter’ on a new sci-fant title. Anyways, good luck to all involved in the future – and to Pope Benedick XVI is his future as well.

So, here’s my reply:

Dear Gary,

The official press release — which I helped to write — states categorically:

Miniature Wargames will continue to be fiercely independent under Henry’s command. The publication will showcase the hobby in all its many and varied aspects, including historical, fantasy, sci-fi and ‘imagi-nations’, covering all scales from 3mm to 54mm, suiting all styles from Kriegsspiel counters to the most exquisite miniatures, from ‘old school’ to ‘new school’, and all age groups “from twelve years of age to one hundred and fifty” as H G Wells famously wrote. In short, our intention is to ensure that Miniature Wargames is the flagship of the hobby, equipped to face the next 30 years.

Also, MW is going to see a substantial increase in page count, so there will be room for me to keep the promise I’ve made above.

If you actually look at the articles published in the last 33 issues of Battlegames, the number of ‘old school’ (and that’s “school” with a “ch”) articles is actually very few – but I refuse to apologise for publishing them, as ‘old school’ has seen a resurgence in popularity in recent years and is a perfectly valid aspect of the hobby. I launched Battlegames because the hobby magazines at the time were ignoring this type of gaming completely, and I’m proud to have given it a voice.

Every month, I shall be putting together the magazine that I want to read – and my tastes are very wide indeed. It’s a HUGE mistake to think I only play Grantian/Featherstonian games; I don’t, as will be shown by my book coming out later this year; and it’s also erroneous to think that 18th century = ‘old school’. Is Black Powder ‘old school’? Or Maurice? Or General de Brigade/Kriegskunst? If, by ‘old school’, you mean “fun”, then sure, I’m guilty as charged. My only criterion is quality – if an article is of the right quality, regardless of the subject matter, it goes in. Didn’t you notice that I even wrote a fantasy article myself for BG33? Or that Ashley Pollard has started reviewing sci-fi for the mag?

What I will be insisting on is that the primary focus is on the game and the hobby, in all its many and varied forms, and I shall be communicating this to contributors.

What your own comments reveal is how important perception and prejudices are. Are you and your friends going to pre-judge the new Miniature Wargames before it has even seen the light of day? Or is it like Minority Report, and I’m being accused of something I haven’t done yet?

The proof, as I seem to be saying a lot in the last 24 hours, will be in the pudding.

7 comments for “The Pudding and the Proof

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.